Noah: How to Find Favor with God
Genesis 6-9
We begin a series of messages
for the summer that are based on characters in the Old Testament Scriptures. A
warning needs to be sounded concerning what are often referred to as “biographical
sermons.” They can easily be illegitimate to the text.
Biblical characters must not be preached with the idea
in mind of imitating the characters.
If the figures become examples or models for imitation, we have missed the
biblical point. Preaching a biblical character with the idea in mind of
recommending to the congregation that the good qualities of the character be
imitated and the bad qualities of the character be avoided is a “wrong-headed”
interpretive method.
What standards are to be used to evaluate the “good”
or the “bad”? The Old Testament standards?
The New Testament standards? contemporary standards?
When preaching is
biographical and suggests imitation of the biblical character, it does not do
full justice to the historical context of the story in the Scriptures.
Basically, much biographical preaching ignores the gap between the contemporary
time and the biblical time and simply equates the two times, as if there were
no gap. The “now” and the “then” are laid on top of each other as if they were
one and the same; but, of course they are not.
When preaching
biographically, there tends to be shift from the descriptions found in the
stories to prescriptions found in the preacher’s sermon. That is, what the
story describes, the preacher prescribes. Description is a necessary
tool for telling a story and when biblical characters become the sermon topic,
the descriptive elements of the story may one by one or in groups become
prescription for the contemporary audience. One is left wondering if the
description of characters in the Bible is meant by the original author to be a
prescription of certain behavior to the modern reader.
Another strong problem with
biographical preaching is the tendency to present the human characters as in
some way worthy of imitation so that the focus of the message is shifted from a
theocentric one to an anthropocentric one, that is from God to man. The stories
of the Old Testament are not related to us so that we can learn how humanity
acts in any given story but so that we can learn how God acts. And as you are
aware from your reading of the Old Testament and New Testament stories, God
often works his work despite the works of men, rather than through their works.
There is a tendency when
preaching sermons from the biblical stories of people’s lives (or more
accurately, very, very small slices of their lives) to make the sermon a
moralizing experience for the contemporary congregation: See, do this and the
same thing that happened to this character will happen to you. Moralizing can
go either toward the good or the bad. Do the good of this character and the
good that happened to him or her will happen to you. Do the bad of this
character and the bad that happened to him or her will happen to you.
A problem is immediately
recognized: how do you put the “good” and/or “bad” of the character in right
perspective? Which moral demands do you choose out of the character’s
presentation in the Scriptures?
So, why are we entering a
series of sermons with the stories of certain Old Testament figures as guides
to the selection of the messages?
These stories are in the
Bible and they need to be told. However, we must, as a contemporary audience,
yield to the original intention of the biblical author relative to the stories told.
We must always ask, what was the original relevance of the story?
Overhearing the biblical
story allows us entry into the story and provides an opportunity for us to
learn something about God and his actions, not simply to pick up some character
traits, positive or negative, of biblical characters. We retell these stories
to hear God speak afresh in our own lives through these stories. If we do not
hear God speak or see God act, we have abused the story or, at least, misused
the story.
But the narrative tales are a
large portion of the Bible and we can gain insight into the work and word of
God by overhearing his work and word with others.
[Much is owed to The Modern Preacher and the Ancient Text, Sidney
Greidanus, 160-66, 175-181]
We begin our series with the
story of Noah. But we must recognize that what appears to be Noah’s story is
God’s opportunity to show us his word and work in our world.
Genesis
Genesis
Genesis 8:1 (NIV) But God
remembered Noah and all the wild
animals and the livestock that were with him in the ark, and he sent a wind
over the earth, and the waters receded.
Genesis 8:17 (NIV) Bring out every kind of living creature that is with
you--the birds, the animals, and all the creatures that move along the
ground--so they can multiply on the earth and be fruitful and increase in
number upon it."
Genesis 9:1 (NIV) Then God
blessed Noah and his sons, saying to them, "Be fruitful and increase
in number and fill the earth.
Genesis
Genesis
We suggested in the
introduction on biographical preaching that we must determine what the author
meant by the stories told. It seems clear from the words of Genesis 6:8 that
the original readers were to understand that Noah found favor in God’s eyes. We
will briefly see what God favors in our lives.
The Difference
Genesis 6:5-8 (NIV) 5 The
LORD saw how great man's wickedness on the earth had become, and that every
inclination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil all the time. 6 The LORD was grieved that he had made
man on the earth, and his heart was filled with pain. 7 So the LORD said, "I will wipe
mankind, whom I have created, from the face of the earth--men and animals, and
creatures that move along the ground, and birds of the air--for I am grieved
that I have made them." 8 But Noah found favor in the eyes of the
LORD.
How did Noah find favor in
the eyes of the Lord?
1. Noah was a righteous and blameless man
TEXT:
Genesis 6:9 (NIV) This is the account of Noah. Noah was a righteous man,
blameless among the people of his time
EXPLANATION:
Noah was a righteous and
blameless man. Was he so because of his “genes and chromosomes”? No. The action
of God in Noah’s life allows Noah to be righteous and blameless.
APPLICATION:
Can we be “righteous and
blameless” today? Yes. Do we achieve this goal by our own goodness and our own
personality? No.
2. Noah
walked with God
TEXT:
Genesis 6:9b (NIV) and he walked with God.
EXPLANATION:
The key is that Noah walked with God. None of the story is possible
if the story is read from an anthropocentric focus. Noah’s story is absolutely
dependent upon God for its telling.
APPLICATION:
Can we walk with God today?
Yes. Do we do so because of something about us or something about God? It is
God’s work in us that allows us to be pleasing to him. We can only be a living
sacrifice to God because God esteems us so. He esteems us so because he redeems
us so.
3. Noah
obeyed God
TEXT:
Genesis
EXPLANATION:
Again, imagine this statement
that Noah obeyed God without God in
the statement. It cannot be imagined. Did Noah do something that required God
to come to him and honor him with guidance and direction? No. Noah was
absolutely dependent upon God’s move toward Noah.
APPLICATION:
Can we obey God today? Yes,
but only as we yield to God’s Spirit at work in us to escort us to obedience.